| Subject | : | Microsoft Settlement |
| Author | : | Martin |
| Date | : | 21 Feb, 2005 on 23:04 |
| I found something funny on the Microsoft Settlement webpages about OS/2 from 12/4/2001 :
Of course, it didn't happened. |
| Subject | : | Re:Microsoft Settlement |
| Author | : | Radek hajek@vuv.cz |
| Date | : | 22 Feb, 2005 on 16:46 |
| Thanks God it didn't! Imagine that all those winblows viruses would find something that they would understand in the operating system! A reliable operating system MUST NOT contain any William Setag's API! |
| Subject | : | Re:Microsoft Settlement |
| Author | : | RosinCore rcore@canada.com |
| Date | : | 22 Feb, 2005 on 17:19 |
That would have been great! MS to *pay* IBM to develop a new modern OS/2?! How could that be bad?! IBM would just have to develop the same features as XP, IBM wouldn't have to incorporate the same security flaws. ![]() |
| Subject | : | Great Job on OS/2; therefore,.. |
| Author | : | BigWarpGuy |
| Date | : | 23 Feb, 2005 on 15:38 |
| IBM did a great job on OS/2, updating it to be more competetive/compatible with Windows would be great since it would mean an OS that is more stable yet run all/most of the current Win software.
--- BigWarpGuy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OS/2 Warp-ed/eComStation-ed to the very end. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |